Shortened therapy for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus.

The final answer? 

Autores: Soza Alejandro, Barrera Martínez Francisco

Fragmento

Article commented: Christophe Moreno, Pierre Deltenre, Jean-Michel Pawlotsky, Jean Henrion, Michael Adler, Philippe Mathurin. Shortened treatment duration in treatment-naive genotype 1 HCV patients with rapid virological response: A meta-analysis. Journal of Hepatology 2010; 52: 25-31. Original Abstract Background & Aims: In hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) patients with a rapid viral decline within the first month of therapy, a 24-week course of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha and ribavirin treatment has been claimed to be as efficient as the standard 48-week duration. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials comparing less than 48 weeks to 48 weeks PEG-IFN alpha/ribavirin treatment in 807 HCV-1 patients with rapid viral decline. Results: SVR was significantly less frequent with short treatment duration than with 48 weeks of therapy, with a mean difference of -13.6% (95% CI: -22.8% to -4.4%, p = 0.004). This difference was related to a higher relapse rate (mean difference: 9.9%, 95% CI: 4.1¡V15.7%, p < 0.001). In a sensitivity analysis restricted to studies using only a weight-based ribavirin regimen, shorter therapy was also less efficient. In the subgroup of patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 and a low baseline HCV-RNA level („T 400,000 IU/mL), there was no significant difference in SVR rates between 24 and 48 weeks of treatment (mean difference: -3.10%, 95% CI: -8.6% to 2.4%, NS). Conclusions: In HCV-1 patients with a rapid virological response, 24 weeks of combination therapy with PEG-IFN alpha and ribavirin should be considered only in subjects with low baseline viral load. However, the optimal cut-off defining low baseline viral load and the impact of the presence of other factors capable of altering treatment response, remain subject to debate.

Palabras clave:

2010-05-11   |   1,400 visitas   |   Evalua este artículo 0 valoraciones

Vol. 9 Núm.1. Enero-Marzo 2010 Pags. 112-113 Ann Hepatol 2010; 9(1)